Off-plan developers, scored on what the record actually shows

A count of buildings, never a punctuality record. "Handover years" is how many distinct calendar years the developer has a completion in, which separates a steady book from one large cohort delivered at once.

Each project's median rate per sqft over the median of the other builders' projects in the same community, then the median of those ratios. The developer's own projects are excluded from every benchmark it is measured against, so a builder holding most of a masterplan is not compared with itself. A community needs 4 projects by other builders before it can form a benchmark. The median of all 1,447 comparisons in the corpus is 1.00x, which is the check that the definition is not biased: it should be 1 and it is.

Straight from the payment plan work: how much less a unit costs in today's money than its headline once the developer's own published schedule is discounted at 5.0% a year. Market median 5.26% over 2,041 priced schedules. It measures terms, not price, and a deep discount on an expensive unit is still an expensive unit.

Concentration is the sum of the squared community shares of the developer's live off-plan book: 1.00 is a single community, and the more communities it spreads across the lower it goes. The corpus median is 0.37. This is a statement about where a buyer's exposure sits, in either direction, not a verdict: a masterplan developer concentrated in its own community is doing its job, and a spread book carries a different risk, not less of it.

The share of five listing facts published across that developer's own off-plan projects, market average 86%. This is the one measure on the page that scores disclosure rather than buildings, and the one a developer can move in a week by publishing what it already knows.

Or start from a place: every community and every developer has its own benchmark page, and all rankings are listed together.