When the money is due, not when the buildings finish
A handover pipeline says when buildings complete. It does not say when the cash is called, and the two calendars are years apart. A project completing in 2027 has been collecting construction instalments the whole way there, takes its largest single payment on the day the keys move, and, if the plan carries a tail, goes on collecting for two or three years after that. At any one quarter three waves are paying at once.
This maps all of them. 50,297 priced unit records across 1,618 tracked off-plan projects, each put through the payment plan its own developer publishes, placed on the quarter the plan puts it on. AED 163.01B of committed schedule value across 24 quarters. It is a projection of published schedules and not a forecast of anything: read the box below before you read a bar.
This is a projection of published payment schedules, not a forecast. It takes the 50,297 priced unit records held for 1,618 tracked off-plan projects, values them at their listed prices, and puts each one through the payment plan its developer publishes. The result is the money that would fall due, quarter by quarter, if every one of those units were bought today. Every unit is not bought today. Nothing on this page says a single dirham of it will be paid.
- This is a schedule projection, not a forecast. It models every unit record we hold as bought on the valuation date at its listed price on the plan the developer publishes. Real off-plan absorption is partial and staggered, so no quarter here will be collected in full.
- It counts only units in this corpus, and it weights a project by how many priced unit records were published for it. Those records are a sample of each building inventory, and the sampling rate is not uniform: one tower with three thousand listed units outweighs eighty small projects. Every AED figure is therefore a floor on the market and a distorted share of it, which is why every group row names the single project driving its heaviest quarter and repeats the same concentration on a one-median-unit-per-project basis where a scrape cannot skew it.
- Booking money is placed on the valuation date by construction of the model. Most of this book launched months or years ago and collected its reservation money then, at a date this corpus does not hold. Read the booking band as money due on reservation, never as bookings expected this quarter.
- Construction instalments are spread evenly across the remaining months to handover, and because the model buys on the valuation date, a project completing in six months has its whole construction schedule compressed into those six months. In reality most of that money was collected across the build, at dates this corpus does not hold. The first year of the calendar is therefore overstated against the far end, and the near bars read as what a buyer entering today would owe, not as what the market will pay. Real schedules are also tied to build milestones that are never published in advance and that slip, so an even spread is a model rather than a schedule.
- Handover dates are the developer own targets scraped from portals. They move, and they move later far more often than earlier. Every quarter on this calendar inherits that.
- Nothing here is discounted for the time value of money. A dirham due in 2031 is counted as a dirham. The discounted reading of the same schedules is the effective price.
Counted over 1,618 of 2,962 tracked off-plan projects, 54.6 percent. The rest are excluded for a stated reason: 699 publish no payment plan that sums, 282 carry a handover date that has already passed or is missing, and 363 carry no priced unit record to value. The calendar runs 2026 Q4 to 2032 Q3 and 99.7 percent of the modelled obligation lands inside it; the AED 667.5M that does not is post-handover tail money running past the horizon. Method and rollback are in the methodology. Not investment advice.
The whole book on one calendar
The tall first bar is not a forecast of a booking rush. The model buys every unit on the valuation date, so all reservation money lands in Q4 2026 by construction. Read the black band as money due on reservation whenever a reservation happens. On the same reasoning the first year of construction money is compressed: a project completing in six months has its whole remaining schedule squeezed into those six months, when in reality most of it was collected across the build at dates this corpus does not hold.
Where the calendar and the pipeline disagree
| Year | Due, excluding reservation money | Share of calendar | Projects handing over | AED per handover |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AED 26.48B | 19.2% | 180 | AED 147.1M |
| 2027 | AED 47.34B | 34.2% | 568 | AED 83.3M |
| 2028 | AED 34.37B | 24.9% | 471 | AED 73.0M |
| 2029 | AED 21.70B | 15.7% | 228 | AED 95.2M |
| 2030 | AED 6.41B | 4.6% | 61 | AED 105.1M |
| 2031 | AED 1.40B | 1.0% | 4 | AED 348.8M |
| 2032 | AED 530.7M | 0.4% | 0 | n/a |
2027 carries the most money at AED 47.34B, 2027 the most buildings at 568. The gap between those two columns is the whole point of this page: cash and completion are different calendars, and a buyer who plans against the completion one is planning against the wrong number. The last column is the crude version of the same thing, money due per building handed over, and it falls steadily across the horizon because the far years are still selling their construction phase while the near years are settling.
The tail outlives the building
A post-handover tail is the cheapest thing in a plan to advertise and the longest-lived obligation in it. Tails are only 6.0 percent of the committed calendar and only 22.4 percent of projects carry one, so at market level they are a rounding error. At the far end of the calendar they are almost everything: past Q1 2031 the money still due is owed on buildings that were finished years earlier, by buyers who already have the keys and a service charge bill.
| Quarter | Due | Handover payments | Tail instalments | Projects paying | Already handed over |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2026 | AED 51.04B | AED 9.07B | AED 13.2M | 1,616 | 0 |
| Q1 2027 | AED 13.36B | AED 3.59B | AED 123.8M | 1,428 | 47 (3%) |
| Q2 2027 | AED 11.02B | AED 3.35B | AED 155.7M | 1,350 | 73 (5%) |
| Q3 2027 | AED 9.92B | AED 3.32B | AED 225.6M | 1,243 | 114 (9%) |
| Q4 2027 | AED 13.05B | AED 7.09B | AED 323.3M | 1,162 | 139 (12%) |
| Q1 2028 | AED 7.56B | AED 2.90B | AED 412.0M | 985 | 202 (21%) |
| Q2 2028 | AED 10.45B | AED 5.99B | AED 519.7M | 908 | 227 (25%) |
| Q3 2028 | AED 6.22B | AED 2.78B | AED 569.9M | 818 | 256 (31%) |
| Q4 2028 | AED 10.36B | AED 7.35B | AED 614.0M | 769 | 279 (36%) |
| Q1 2029 | AED 4.40B | AED 2.29B | AED 672.9M | 597 | 298 (50%) |
| Q2 2029 | AED 5.74B | AED 3.83B | AED 688.3M | 539 | 289 (54%) |
| Q3 2029 | AED 5.16B | AED 3.45B | AED 689.6M | 460 | 279 (61%) |
| Q4 2029 | AED 6.40B | AED 4.91B | AED 722.5M | 404 | 268 (66%) |
| Q1 2030 | AED 1.83B | AED 881.8M | AED 642.9M | 298 | 231 (78%) |
| Q2 2030 | AED 1.78B | AED 1.01B | AED 553.7M | 262 | 210 (80%) |
| Q3 2030 | AED 989.7M | AED 336.3M | AED 510.8M | 204 | 181 (89%) |
| Q4 2030 | AED 1.81B | AED 1.20B | AED 490.0M | 179 | 165 (92%) |
| Q1 2031 | AED 407.1M | 0 | AED 385.8M | 126 | 121 (96%) |
| Q2 2031 | AED 395.9M | AED 33.0M | AED 341.5M | 114 | 109 (96%) |
| Q3 2031 | AED 305.1M | 0 | AED 301.4M | 95 | 93 (98%) |
| Q4 2031 | AED 287.0M | AED 6.46M | AED 276.9M | 86 | 84 (98%) |
| Q1 2032 | AED 215.0M | 0 | AED 213.5M | 66 | 65 (99%) |
| Q2 2032 | AED 166.0M | 0 | AED 164.5M | 52 | 51 (98%) |
| Q3 2032 | AED 149.7M | 0 | AED 148.2M | 42 | 41 (98%) |
Quarters with fewer than 25 projects paying in do not get a page of their own. Every figure is committed schedule value on the corpus described above, never a transaction.
Concentration by community
The heaviest quarter as a share of a community's own calendar, which is the closest thing to a cash concentration measure this corpus supports. Read it with the two columns beside it. The one project column is what share of that peak quarter is a single building, and the per project column repeats the concentration with every project weighted equally instead of by how many unit records were listed for it. Where the two disagree sharply, the concentration is one tower with a deep listing and not a fact about the address.
| Community | Projects | Committed | Heaviest quarter | Share of own calendar | One project | Per project basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dubai South | 88 | AED 8.83B | Q4 2026 | 81.5% | 76% | 48.2% |
| Dubai Marina | 11 | AED 2.69B | Q4 2026 | 58.3% | 48% | 47.7% |
| Downtown Dubai | 13 | AED 2.37B | Q4 2026 | 54.7% | 64% | 38.2% |
| Hudayriyat Island | 10 | AED 680.7M | Q4 2026 | 52.4% | 89% | 33.6% |
| Mohammed Bin Rashid City | 30 | AED 3.45B | Q4 2026 | 42.3% | 23% | 45.4% |
| Majan | 24 | AED 2.58B | Q4 2027 | 41.3% | 75% | 36.2% Q4 2026 |
| Business Bay | 41 | AED 10.36B | Q4 2026 | 39.1% | 21% | 31.5% |
| Mina Al Arab | 14 | AED 775.1M | Q4 2026 | 39.0% | 41% | 54.5% |
| Dubailand Residence Complex | 10 | AED 255.5M | Q4 2026 | 38.7% | 60% | 44.2% |
| Dubai Investments Park | 30 | AED 2.63B | Q3 2029 | 37.4% | 98% | 19.0% Q4 2026 |
| Al Warsan | 16 | AED 226.1M | Q1 2027 | 36.4% | 46% | 28.7% Q4 2026 |
| Meydan | 24 | AED 1.65B | Q4 2026 | 36.2% | 52% | 30.6% |
| Palm Jumeirah | 15 | AED 7.55B | Q4 2026 | 36.2% | 36% | 46.9% |
| Dubai Sports City | 11 | AED 529.4M | Q4 2026 | 34.7% | 28% | 29.5% |
| Dubai Islands | 125 | AED 9.36B | Q4 2026 | 34.2% | 22% | 32.0% |
| Al Furjan | 27 | AED 906.0M | Q4 2026 | 33.3% | 17% | 42.8% |
| Jumeirah Village Triangle | 30 | AED 1.59B | Q4 2026 | 32.9% | 43% | 34.6% |
| Jebel Ali | 15 | AED 2.77B | Q4 2029 | 32.9% | 52% | 23.9% |
| Dubai Harbour | 10 | AED 4.20B | Q3 2027 | 32.8% | 95% | 35.1% Q1 2027 |
| Masdar City | 10 | AED 129.2M | Q3 2029 | 32.7% | 97% | 15.4% Q2 2028 |
| Arjan | 20 | AED 490.2M | Q4 2026 | 32.5% | 11% | 47.0% |
| DAMAC Lagoons | 11 | AED 832.3M | Q4 2028 | 31.6% | 100% | 56.7% Q4 2026 |
| Dubai Maritime City | 25 | AED 1.66B | Q4 2026 | 30.8% | 43% | 27.7% |
| Yas Island | 15 | AED 565.2M | Q4 2026 | 29.7% | 57% | 23.4% |
| Wasl Gate | 11 | AED 256.1M | Q4 2027 | 29.4% | 64% | 25.0% |
| Dubai Hills Estate | 24 | AED 942.9M | Q4 2026 | 29.2% | 13% | 36.6% |
| DAMAC Islands | 11 | AED 149.9M | Q4 2028 | 28.3% | 47% | 25.8% |
| Dubai Land Residence Complex | 71 | AED 1.62B | Q4 2026 | 28.1% | 10% | 31.9% |
| Jumeirah Village Circle | 89 | AED 3.25B | Q4 2026 | 28.1% | 6% | 35.9% |
| Nad Al Sheba | 17 | AED 7.83B | Q4 2026 | 27.3% | 37% | 23.2% |
| Dubailand | 55 | AED 5.25B | Q2 2028 | 27.1% | 63% | 18.0% Q4 2026 |
| Dubai Creek Harbour | 16 | AED 731.8M | Q4 2026 | 26.6% | 25% | 35.9% |
| Palm Jebel Ali | 18 | AED 1.61B | Q4 2026 | 25.6% | 28% | 26.6% |
| Bukadra | 27 | AED 4.35B | Q4 2026 | 25.0% | 31% | 35.3% |
| Al Jaddaf | 12 | AED 1.10B | Q4 2027 | 24.9% | 39% | 43.8% Q4 2026 |
| Town Square | 20 | AED 114.9M | Q3 2027 | 24.8% | 46% | 23.3% Q4 2026 |
| Dubai Industrial City | 19 | AED 383.9M | Q4 2026 | 24.3% | 45% | 27.7% |
| Dubai Production City | 23 | AED 510.3M | Q4 2028 | 23.4% | 86% | 24.7% Q4 2026 |
| Al Satwa | 21 | AED 836.5M | Q4 2026 | 22.9% | 24% | 27.2% |
| Umm Al Quwain Marina | 21 | AED 3.60B | Q4 2026 | 22.8% | 12% | 19.7% |
| Jumeirah Islands | 11 | AED 902.3M | Q4 2029 | 22.5% | 84% | 24.3% Q2 2030 |
| Motor City | 14 | AED 2.44B | Q4 2027 | 22.4% | 39% | 28.8% |
| Expo City Dubai | 10 | AED 384.8M | Q4 2026 | 21.9% | 25% | 29.2% |
| Al Reem Island | 30 | AED 1.14B | Q4 2028 | 21.4% | 45% | 18.8% |
| Mina Rashid | 20 | AED 1.25B | Q4 2026 | 20.4% | 15% | 20.3% |
| Muwaileh | 21 | AED 866.0M | Q2 2028 | 19.9% | 67% | 16.2% Q4 2026 |
| Al Marjan Island | 62 | AED 7.19B | Q4 2026 | 19.8% | 14% | 25.2% |
| The Valley | 21 | AED 867.7M | Q4 2026 | 19.2% | 12% | 20.7% |
| The Oasis by Emaar | 10 | AED 1.24B | Q4 2026 | 18.8% | 22% | 20.5% |
| Saadiyat Island | 15 | AED 1.86B | Q1 2030 | 18.7% | 100% | 26.7% Q4 2026 |
| International City | 10 | AED 353.0M | Q4 2026 | 18.6% | 39% | 23.4% |
One project column: the share of the heaviest quarter carried by the single largest project in it, hover for its name. Per project basis: the same peak share computed with one median-priced unit per project, and the quarter it moves to when it moves. Communities below 10 tracked projects are absent rather than ranked on thin evidence.
Concentration by developer
| Developer | Projects | Committed | Heaviest quarter | Share of own calendar | One project | Per project basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mira Developments | 8 | AED 280.2M | Q4 2026 | 70.0% | 74% | 90.8% |
| Azizi | 33 | AED 10.70B | Q4 2026 | 68.6% | 74% | 70.8% |
| Eagle Hills | 10 | AED 382.5M | Q4 2026 | 56.1% | 48% | 41.4% |
| Modon | 13 | AED 726.6M | Q4 2026 | 49.6% | 89% | 31.5% |
| Zoya | 9 | AED 65.7M | Q4 2026 | 48.1% | 67% | 34.3% |
| Omniyat | 9 | AED 3.42B | Q4 2026 | 45.6% | 63% | 41.7% |
| Danube | 16 | AED 3.34B | Q4 2026 | 42.8% | 40% | 36.2% |
| Ellington | 34 | AED 951.2M | Q4 2026 | 42.4% | 29% | 57.6% |
| Nakheel | 35 | AED 5.15B | Q4 2026 | 41.5% | 24% | 33.9% |
| Iman Developers | 8 | AED 137.5M | Q2 2029 | 37.8% | 89% | 31.3% |
| Imtiaz | 27 | AED 405.2M | Q4 2026 | 36.3% | 19% | 39.0% |
| Samana | 29 | AED 591.0M | Q4 2026 | 36.3% | 20% | 36.5% |
| Binghatti | 33 | AED 14.72B | Q4 2026 | 35.8% | 16% | 47.9% |
| RAK | 14 | AED 797.3M | Q4 2026 | 35.5% | 43% | 51.9% |
| Taraf | 10 | AED 497.1M | Q4 2026 | 34.9% | 50% | 26.7% |
| Prestige One | 11 | AED 312.3M | Q4 2026 | 33.3% | 30% | 37.1% |
| DAMAC | 75 | AED 7.17B | Q4 2026 | 32.6% | 17% | 40.6% |
| Beyond | 13 | AED 1.44B | Q3 2029 | 32.0% | 87% | 17.6% |
| Wasl | 12 | AED 342.1M | Q4 2028 | 32.0% | 41% | 36.1% |
| Meraas | 31 | AED 6.66B | Q4 2026 | 31.2% | 11% | 30.8% |
| Mr Eight | 8 | AED 1.76B | Q4 2027 | 30.7% | 54% | 28.5% |
| H&H | 8 | AED 2.08B | Q3 2027 | 29.8% | 90% | 24.6% |
| Majid Al Futtaim | 8 | AED 461.4M | Q4 2029 | 28.8% | 100% | 33.9% |
| Object 1 | 39 | AED 1.46B | Q4 2026 | 27.9% | 12% | 31.4% |
| Tiger Properties | 11 | AED 1.52B | Q4 2026 | 27.1% | 54% | 31.4% |
| Sobha Realty | 70 | AED 20.12B | Q4 2026 | 27.0% | 14% | 32.8% |
| Nshama | 21 | AED 326.9M | Q2 2028 | 27.0% | 94% | 21.4% |
| Dugasta | 8 | AED 388.4M | Q4 2026 | 26.9% | 40% | 34.7% |
| Bloom Holding | 10 | AED 333.1M | Q4 2027 | 26.8% | 47% | 24.4% |
| Emaar | 139 | AED 7.25B | Q4 2026 | 26.1% | 9% | 24.4% |
| LEOS International | 9 | AED 330.0M | Q4 2028 | 25.0% | 73% | 24.3% |
| Expo City Dubai | 8 | AED 276.8M | Q4 2026 | 24.4% | 31% | 32.6% |
| Alef | 18 | AED 525.1M | Q4 2029 | 23.9% | 97% | 24.9% |
| Dubai South Properties | 10 | AED 174.8M | Q4 2026 | 22.1% | 32% | 23.6% |
| Arada | 35 | AED 5.17B | Q4 2027 | 22.1% | 71% | 30.0% |
| Deyaar | 11 | AED 1.21B | Q4 2027 | 21.7% | 63% | 38.3% |
| Reportage | 24 | AED 4.67B | Q3 2029 | 21.5% | 96% | 22.1% |
| Reef Luxury | 8 | AED 214.7M | Q4 2026 | 20.4% | 38% | 32.0% |
| BNW | 11 | AED 3.17B | Q4 2026 | 19.4% | 33% | 26.2% |
| Avenew | 10 | AED 540.8M | Q1 2029 | 19.0% | 100% | 29.8% |
| Burtville | 8 | AED 529.9M | Q4 2026 | 17.4% | 73% | 18.5% |
| Aldar | 47 | AED 4.07B | Q4 2026 | 16.0% | 14% | 24.7% |
| BT | 8 | AED 355.7M | Q4 2026 | 15.9% | 69% | 17.7% |
| GJ | 9 | AED 1.90B | Q4 2027 | 15.4% | 70% | 18.5% |
| GFS | 14 | AED 68.1M | Q4 2026 | 13.8% | 25% | 15.6% |
By emirate
Dubai
1,285 projects ยท AED 128.63BHeaviest quarter Q4 2026 at 33.7 percent of its own calendar. 38.3 percent of the book is the handover payment itself and 5.7 percent runs after the keys.
Abu Dhabi
128 projects ยท AED 12.45BHeaviest quarter Q4 2026 at 26.2 percent of its own calendar. 44.5 percent of the book is the handover payment itself and 4.7 percent runs after the keys.
Ras Al Khaimah
88 projects ยท AED 9.65BHeaviest quarter Q4 2026 at 20.7 percent of its own calendar. 39.6 percent of the book is the handover payment itself and 4.8 percent runs after the keys.
Umm Al Quwain
27 projects ยท AED 6.05BHeaviest quarter Q4 2026 at 21.7 percent of its own calendar. 40.0 percent of the book is the handover payment itself and 1.9 percent runs after the keys.
Sharjah
66 projects ยท AED 2.96BHeaviest quarter Q4 2028 at 15.2 percent of its own calendar. 53.6 percent of the book is the handover payment itself and 5.4 percent runs after the keys.
Ajman
23 projects ยท AED 2.89BHeaviest quarter Q4 2026 at 18.1 percent of its own calendar. 19.6 percent of the book is the handover payment itself and 39.8 percent runs after the keys.
Your own calendar
The market calendar is the aggregate of everybody's exposure. Yours is the only one that matters, and if you hold two or three off-plan units their schedules overlap in ways no single brochure shows. Put your real projects into the combined payment calendar and it will lay the schedules on one timeline and tell you the single worst month.
Data edition July 2026, valued at 2026-10-02. The timeline is the one in the payment-plan-adjusted effective price ranking, reused step for step so the two features can never disagree about which plan a project is on. Shape agreement between the two value bases is a correlation of 0.993, which is what says the shape of this calendar is a property of the published schedules rather than of the scrape. Definitions in the methodology. Not investment advice.
The full report: every community, every developer, ranked.
Payment milestone calendar in context: price per sqft by community and developer, payment plan structures ranked by cash due before handover, the 2026 to 2029 delivery pipeline, and the CSV behind every table. PDF plus data, delivered instantly.